THE VERDICTBeing an
alternate juror, I did not get to deliberate the case. This was a huge disappointment. I paid attention for eight days of testimony (eight days of focused attention!), then - when we finally get to discuss the case - I was sent packing.
BACKSTORY
The case sums up like this: A cab was trying to cross an intersection when it wasn't his turn. A sporty little Nissan, containing a young couple (to be married the next week), hit the cab at a 45 degree angle. The Nissan was doing about 20 mph. It was totally the cab's fault - nobody even argued that.
PLAINTIFF
With a terribly annoying lawyer, you're sunk. When you're suing for medical damages and you have a flaky, cheerleader-turned-chiropractor testify for you, your dead. When you want $1.1 million because you can't perform your traditional Polish folk dances or have sex, you're done before you start.
DEFENSE
They just had more money, a better lawyer, better professional witnesses, and (killer mover here:) the defense lawyer stated that he knew to a moral certainty that: "The members of this jury would never hold the color of someone's skin, their place of birth, or the God they worshiped against them." He used the man's Arab heritage to their advantage. Brilliant. It worked.
VERDICT
I wasn't there when it was read, but I saw a fellow juror on the street. The plaintiffs (the couple) wanted between $500,000 and $1,100,000 for medical, wages, pain, suffering, repairs, etc. The defense (the cab & cab company) said that, even if you bought the plaintiff argument, it was a $50,000 case at best.
They got $30,000 for some medical. That was it.
LESSON
If a jury feels you're wasting everyone's time - they'll kick you're ass.